Lablanc Ltd. v Nahda Invs. Ltd. [1985] JLR_Note 4b (06 May 1986)
The court held that the delay was not inordinate or contumelious and therefore did not justify striking out the pleadings.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lablanc Ltd.; Respondent: Nahda Invs. Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application to Strike Out Pleadings
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out Pleadings, Delay in Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Lablanc Ltd.
Applicant
Nahda Invs. Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Strike Out Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the delay in proceedings was inordinate or contumelious so as to justify striking out pleadings
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the delay was not inordinate or contumelious and therefore did not justify striking out the pleadings.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment