Lapidus v Davies [1982] JLR 141 (06 July 1982)
Cohabitation with a co-respondent is not a legal bar to an application to vary periodical payments under the relevant Jersey law.
- Citation
- [1982] JLR 141
- Parties
- Applicant: Lapidus; Respondent: Davies
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Application / Application to Vary Periodical Payments
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Financial Provision, Variation of Periodical Payments, Cohabitation and Maintenance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Lapidus
Applicant
Davies
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Application / Application to Vary Periodical Payments
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether cohabitation with a co-respondent bars an application to vary periodical payments under Matrimonial Causes (Jersey) Law 1949, art. 32
Ratio Decidendi
Cohabitation with a co-respondent is not a legal bar to an application to vary periodical payments under the relevant Jersey law.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Application to vary periodical payments is not barred by cohabitation with co-respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment