AG v Le Long [2004] JRC 030 (13 February 2004)

AG v Le Long [2004] JRC 030 (13 February 2004)

Given the defendant's recent decline, lack of credible explanation, and the seriousness of the offences, the court imposed a non-custodial sentence with probation and community service, warning that future offences would likely result in imprisonment.

Citation
[2004] JRC 030
Parties
Defendant: Le Long; Prosecutor: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
13 February 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
non-custodial sentence imposed
Legal Topics
Receiving Stolen Property, Possession of Controlled Substances, Sentencing, Probation, Community Service
Criminal Law Receiving Stolen Property Possession of Controlled Substances Sentencing Probation Community Service

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Le Long

Defendant

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for receiving stolen property and possession of cannabis
  2. 2 Credibility of defendant's explanation for possession of stolen property
  3. 3 Consideration of non-custodial sentence versus imprisonment

Ratio Decidendi

Given the defendant's recent decline, lack of credible explanation, and the seriousness of the offences, the court imposed a non-custodial sentence with probation and community service, warning that future offences would likely result in imprisonment.

Court Disposition

non-custodial sentence imposed

Orders

  • Defendant placed on probation for 1 year with standard conditions and supervision by a Probation Officer.
  • Defendant to attend Drug and Alcohol Service for 1 year and comply with treatment goals.