Jersey Judgment

Le Main v Eves (No. 3) [1999] JLR_Note 10a (23 November 1999)

Civil Procedure Breach of Injunction

Status: Judgment
Jurisdiction: Jersey
Posture: Civil / Judgment

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

Holding and result

The court held that a broad perspective is appropriate in determining whether there has been a breach of injunction.

Material facts

Parties

Le Main

Applicant

Eves

Respondent

Procedural history

Posture

Civil / Judgment

Questions and positions

Legal issues

What is the appropriate perspective for assessing breach of injunction?

Court’s reasoning

Legal principles

01
Le Main v Eves (No. 3) [1999] JLR_Note 10a

A broad perspective is appropriate when assessing breach of injunction.

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that a broad perspective is appropriate in determining whether there has been a breach of injunction.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Le Main v Eves (No. 3) [1999] JLR_Note 10a (23 November 1999) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1999/JLR99N010a.html Cite as: [1999] JLR_Note 10a [ New search ] [ Help ] Le Main v Eves (No. 3) 1999 JLR Note 10a (23 November 1999) BREACH OF INJUNCTION-broad perspective appropriate The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1999 JLR Note 10a BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1999/JLR99N010a.html

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.