Jersey Judgment

Le Marquand v Chiltmead [1987] JLR 86 (27 March 1987)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Registration in Jersey of a UK judgment in favour of a company liquidator against a defaulting director is not the enforcement of a foreign revenue claim merely because the judgment includes a substantial element in respect of tax due in the UK.

Court disposition

application granted

Orders

  • UK judgment registered in Jersey

02

Material facts

Parties

Le Marquand

Applicant

Chiltmead

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Application for Registration of Foreign Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether registration in Jersey of a UK judgment in favour of a company liquidator against a defaulting director constitutes enforcement of a foreign revenue claim when the judgment includes a substantial element for tax due in the UK

Party arguments

Applicant
The registration of the UK judgment should be permitted as it is not the enforcement of a foreign revenue claim merely because it includes a tax element.
Respondent
The registration should be refused as it would amount to enforcement of a foreign revenue claim, which is not permitted.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    conflict of laws doctrine

    Enforcement of foreign revenue laws is generally not permitted in Jersey courts.

  2. 02

    case law and conflict of laws principles

    Registration of a foreign judgment is not precluded merely because the judgment includes a tax element, provided the primary claim is not for the enforcement of revenue law.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Registration in Jersey of a UK judgment in favour of a company liquidator against a defaulting director is not the enforcement of a foreign revenue claim merely because the judgment includes a substantial element in respect of tax due in the UK.

Court disposition

application granted

  • UK judgment registered in Jersey

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1987] JLR 86

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Le Marquand v Chiltmead [1987] JLR 86 (27 March 1987) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1987/JLR870086.html Cite as: [1987] JLR 86 [ New search ] [ Help ] Le Marquand v Chiltmead 1987 JLR 86 (27 March 1987) Conflict of Laws - application of foreign law - foreign revenue law - registration in Jersey of UK judgment in favour of company liquidator against defaulting director not enforcement of foreign revenue claim merely because judgment includes substantial element in respect of tax due in UK The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1987 JLR 86 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1987/JLR870086.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.