Leeds Utd. v. Admatch [2014] 2 JLR_Note 28 (03 October 2014)
Security for costs is granted where the applicant demonstrates a real risk of non-payment by the respondent.
- Parties
- Applicant: Leeds United; Respondent: Admatch
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Security for Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Leeds United
Applicant
Admatch
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered
Ratio Decidendi
Security for costs is granted where the applicant demonstrates a real risk of non-payment by the respondent.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Respondent to provide security for costs as ordered by the court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment