Lloyd v Att. Gen. [2004] JLR_Note 28 (09 June 2004)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court held that proceeds of drug trafficking are liable to confiscation under relevant statutes.
Court disposition
judgment delivered
02
Material facts
Parties
Lloyd
ApplicantAttorney General
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
proceeds of drug trafficking
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Jersey criminal law
Proceeds of drug trafficking are subject to confiscation.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court held that proceeds of drug trafficking are liable to confiscation under relevant statutes.
Court disposition
judgment delivered
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Lloyd v Att. Gen. [2004] JLR_Note 28 (09 June 2004) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2004/JLR04N028.html Cite as: [2004] JLR_Note 28 [ New search ] [ Help ] Lloyd v Att. Gen. 2004 JLR Note 28 (09 June 2004) Criminal Law-drugs-proceeds of trafficking The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2004 JLR Note 28 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2004/JLR04N028.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.