AG v Lovegrove and McShane [2002] JRC 154 (16 August 2002)

AG v Lovegrove and McShane [2002] JRC 154 (16 August 2002)

The defendants' actions, though provoked and resulting in no significant injury, constituted grave and criminal assault; guilty pleas and Lovegrove's peacemaking role justified differential sentencing.

Citation
[2002] JRC 154
Parties
Defendant: Lovegrove; Defendant: McShane; Prosecutor: Attorney General; Victim: Victim
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
16 August 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
conviction and sentencing
Legal Topics
Assault, Sentencing, Provocation, Guilty Plea
Criminal Law Assault Sentencing Provocation Guilty Plea

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lovegrove

Defendant

McShane

Defendant

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Victim

Victim

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants' actions constituted grave and criminal assault
  2. 2 Whether provocation and guilty pleas affect sentencing
  3. 3 Whether differentiation between defendants is justified

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants' actions, though provoked and resulting in no significant injury, constituted grave and criminal assault; guilty pleas and Lovegrove's peacemaking role justified differential sentencing.

Court Disposition

conviction and sentencing

Orders

  • Lovegrove sentenced to 9 months imprisonment
  • McShane sentenced to 12 months imprisonment