Ls v Ns [2007] JLR_Note 19 (01 February 2007)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Injunction / Breach of Injunction
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court considered its powers regarding enforcement of injunctions and attaching powers of arrest in cases of breach.
02
Material facts
Parties
Ls
ApplicantNs
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Injunction / Breach of Injunction
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
breach of injunction
- 02
powers of arrest for breach
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
common law
Court's power to enforce injunctions and attach powers of arrest
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court considered its powers regarding enforcement of injunctions and attaching powers of arrest in cases of breach.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Ls v Ns [2007] JLR_Note 19 (01 February 2007) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2007/JLR07N019.html Cite as: [2007] JLR_Note 19 [ New search ] [ Help ] Ls v Ns 2007 JLR Note 19 (01 February 2007) Injunctions-breach of injunction-powers of arrest The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2007 JLR Note 19 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2007/JLR07N019.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.