Marett v Att. Gen. [2004] JLR_Note 54 (21 December 2004)
The court considered the appropriate sentence for a habitual offender under Jersey law.
- Parties
- Applicant: Marett; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Legal Topics
- Habitual Offenders, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Marett
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for a habitual offender?
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the appropriate sentence for a habitual offender under Jersey law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment