Holden v AG [2003] JCA 017 (20 January 2003)
The sentence of 3 years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle, as all aggravating and mitigating factors were properly considered by the sentencing court.
- Citation
- [2003] JCA 017
- Parties
- Applicant: Mark Holden; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing, Appeals, Single Punch Manslaughter
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mark Holden
Applicant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 3 years' imprisonment for single-punch manslaughter was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 3 years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle, as all aggravating and mitigating factors were properly considered by the sentencing court.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment