Jersey Judgment

Martins v Att. Gen. [2008] JLR 183 (22 May 2008)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that the customary law offence of attempt applies to statutory offences, including the offence of attempting to acquire proceeds of drug trafficking under the Drug Trafficking Offences (Jersey) Law 1988, and there is no difference in principle between statutory and customary law offences in this context.

Court disposition

application dismissed

02

Material facts

Parties

Martins

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant contended that the customary law offence of attempt does not apply to statutory offences and that there is a distinction in principle between statutory and customary law offences regarding attempts.
Respondent
The respondent argued that the customary law offence of attempt applies equally to statutory offences and that there is no difference in principle between statutory and customary law offences in this regard.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Drug Trafficking Offences (Jersey) Law 1988, art. 1(1)

    The customary law offence of attempt applies to statutory as well as customary law offences.

  2. 02

    Drug Trafficking Offences (Jersey) Law 1988, art. 1(1)

    There is no difference in principle between statutory and customary law offences regarding attempts.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that the customary law offence of attempt applies to statutory offences, including the offence of attempting to acquire proceeds of drug trafficking under the Drug Trafficking Offences (Jersey) Law 1988, and there is no difference in principle between statutory and customary law offences in this context.

Court disposition

application dismissed

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2008] JLR 183

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Martins v Att. Gen. [2008] JLR 183 (22 May 2008) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2008/JLR080183.html Cite as: [2008] JLR 183 [ New search ] [ Help ] Martins v Att. Gen. 2008 JLR 183 (22 May 2008) Criminal Law-attempts-attempt to commit statutory offence-customary law offence of attempt (and other inchoate offences) applies to statutory as well as customary law offences-no difference in principle between statutory and customary law offences-Drug Trafficking Offences (Jersey) Law 1988, art. 1(1) recognizes customary offence of attempt-offence to attempt to acquire proceeds of drug trafficking, contrary to art. 38(1) The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2008 JLR 183 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2008/JLR080183.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Drug Trafficking Offences (Jersey) Law 1988, art. 1(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Drug Trafficking Offences (Jersey) Law 1988, art. 38(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.