Mayo Associates S.A. v Anagram (Bermuda) Ltd. [1998] JLR_Note 7b (21 January 1998)
The case addresses the procedure to be followed when apparent bias is alleged.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mayo Associates S. A.; Respondent: Anagram (Bermuda) Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Recusation / Not Specified
- Outcome
- not specified
- Legal Topics
- Apparent Bias, Recusal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Mayo Associates S. A.
Applicant
Anagram (Bermuda) Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Recusation / Not Specified
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the proper procedure to be followed in cases of apparent bias?
Ratio Decidendi
The case addresses the procedure to be followed when apparent bias is alleged.
Court Disposition
not specified
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment