Mayo v Anagram [1995] JRC 055 (23 March 1995)

Mayo v Anagram [1995] JRC 055 (23 March 1995)

The court found that Anagram did not fulfill its contractual obligations, constituting a breach.

Citation
[1995] JRC 055
Parties
Applicant: Mayo; Respondent: Anagram
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
23 March 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for applicant
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mayo

Applicant

Anagram

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Anagram breached contractual obligations to Mayo

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Anagram did not fulfill its contractual obligations, constituting a breach.

Court Disposition

judgment for applicant

Orders

  • Anagram to pay damages to Mayo