Mayo v Cantrade [1997] JLR 304 (01 December 1997)
- Citation
- [1997] JLR 304
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Recusation / Judgment
More details
- Posture
- Recusation / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court held that the mere fact that the Bailiff or Deputy Bailiff hears a case involving the States or other Government body does not, by itself, constitute apparent bias or a conflict of interest between judicial and legislative/executive functions.
Court disposition
application for recusation dismissed
02
Material facts
Parties
Mayo
ApplicantCantrade
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Recusation / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the Bailiff or Deputy Bailiff may hear a case in which the States or other Government body is interested and whether this constitutes a conflict between judicial and legislative/executive functions
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant argued that the Bailiff or Deputy Bailiff should be recused from hearing the case due to apparent bias arising from the States or other Government body being interested in the matter, suggesting a conflict between judicial and legislative/executive functions.
- Respondent
- The respondent argued that there is not necessarily a conflict between judicial and legislative/executive functions when the Bailiff or Deputy Bailiff hears such a case, and that apparent bias does not automatically arise in these circumstances.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
[1997] JLR 304
A Bailiff or Deputy Bailiff may hear a case in which the States or other Government body is interested; this does not necessarily create a conflict between judicial and legislative/executive functions or apparent bias.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court held that the mere fact that the Bailiff or Deputy Bailiff hears a case involving the States or other Government body does not, by itself, constitute apparent bias or a conflict of interest between judicial and legislative/executive functions.
Court disposition
application for recusation dismissed
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Mayo v Cantrade [1997] JLR 304 (01 December 1997) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1997/JLR970304.html Cite as: [1997] JLR 304 [ New search ] [ Help ] Mayo v Cantrade 1997 JLR 304 (01 December 1997) Courts - recusation - apparent bias - Bailiff or Deputy Bailiff may hear case in which States or other Government body interested-not necessarily conflict between judicial and legislative/executive functions The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1997 JLR 304 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1997/JLR970304.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.