Jersey Judgment

Mayo v Cantrade [1997] JLR 326 (18 December 1997)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that it may order the Viscount to act as intermediary in pre-trial negotiations with non-parties with an interest in the proceedings and may require parties to confidentially provide the Viscount with the names of such non-parties to facilitate communication of settlement offers.

Court disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The Viscount is to act as intermediary in pre-trial negotiations with non-parties with an interest in the proceedings.
  • Parties are to provide the Viscount, in confidence, with the names of relevant non-parties to allow communication of offers.

02

Material facts

Parties

Mayo

Applicant

Cantrade

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Pre Trial

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant sought court intervention to facilitate pre-trial negotiations involving non-parties with an interest in the proceedings.
Respondent
The respondent opposed or raised issues regarding the court's power to involve the Viscount and require disclosure of non-party identities.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    [1997] JLR 326

    The court may, in the interests of justice, order the Viscount to act as intermediary in pre-trial negotiations with non-parties with an interest in the proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that it may order the Viscount to act as intermediary in pre-trial negotiations with non-parties with an interest in the proceedings and may require parties to confidentially provide the Viscount with the names of such non-parties to facilitate communication of settlement offers.

Court disposition

application granted

  • The Viscount is to act as intermediary in pre-trial negotiations with non-parties with an interest in the proceedings.
  • Parties are to provide the Viscount, in confidence, with the names of relevant non-parties to allow communication of offers.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1997] JLR 326

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Mayo v Cantrade [1997] JLR 326 (18 December 1997) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1997/JLR970326.html Cite as: [1997] JLR 326 [ New search ] [ Help ] Mayo v Cantrade 1997 JLR 326 (18 December 1997) Civil Procedure - settlement of proceedings - pre-trial negotiations - in interests of justice, court may order Viscount to act as intermediary in pre-trial negotiations with non-parties with interest in proceedings-may order parties to give Viscount names of relevant non-parties in confidence, to allow him to communicate offer The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1997 JLR 326 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1997/JLR970326.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.