McFeat -v- AG [2013] JRC 233 (25 November 2013)

McFeat -v- AG [2013] JRC 233 (25 November 2013)

The difference between the sums laundered (£70,000 vs £79,853) was not material to the sentence imposed; the sentence was proportionate and the appeal is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] JRC 233
Parties
Appellant: McFeat; Respondent: The Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
25 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Money Laundering, Drug Trafficking, Sentencing
Criminal Law Money Laundering Drug Trafficking Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

McFeat

Appellant

The Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing court erred by relying on an incorrect amount of money laundered when imposing sentence
  2. 2 Whether the difference between £70,000 and £79,853 laundered was material to sentence

Ratio Decidendi

The difference between the sums laundered (£70,000 vs £79,853) was not material to the sentence imposed; the sentence was proportionate and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed