AG v Kenward [2000] JRC 64 (12 April 2000)
The Court exercised its discretion to make a confiscation order because the money was the proceeds of drug trafficking, and it would be inappropriate for tainted money to be used to pay legal fees. The absence of a funded legal aid system or obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights did not justify withholding the confiscation order.
- Citation
- [2000] JRC 64
- Parties
- Defendant: Michael Thomas Kenward; Prosecution: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing and Confiscation Order
- Outcome
- Application for non-confiscation of tainted money for legal fees dismissed; confiscation order made.
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Order, Drug Trafficking, Legal Aid, Proceeds of Crime, Human Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Thomas Kenward
Defendant
The Crown
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing and Confiscation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a confiscation order should be made in respect of cash representing proceeds of drug trafficking
- 2 Whether tainted money can be used to pay legal fees
- 3 Whether the absence of a funded legal aid system affects the confiscation order
Ratio Decidendi
The Court exercised its discretion to make a confiscation order because the money was the proceeds of drug trafficking, and it would be inappropriate for tainted money to be used to pay legal fees. The absence of a funded legal aid system or obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights did not justify withholding the confiscation order.
Court Disposition
Application for non-confiscation of tainted money for legal fees dismissed; confiscation order made.
Orders
- Confiscation order in the sum of £1,040 made against Michael Thomas Kenward.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment