Millard v Stone and Ors [2022] JRC 262 (30 November 2022)
Amendments to challenge 2015 and 2017 Wills and plead Rapport a la Masse allowed; amendments seeking account and derivative claims refused as special circumstances not established and executor should pursue such claims; practicality and conflict arguments insufficient to justify derivative action.
- Citation
- [2022] JRC 262
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Millard; Defendants: Cox and Ors; Executor: Fourth Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application to Amend Pleadings
- Outcome
- Application to amend allowed in part, refused in part.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Derivative Claims, Undue Influence, Capacity, Discovery, Rapport a La Masse
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Millard
Plaintiff
Cox and Ors
Defendants
Fourth Defendant
Executor
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application to Amend Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff may amend order of justice to include claims to set aside 2015 and 2017 Wills
- 2 Whether plaintiff may plead derivative claims for account against defendants
- 3 Whether amendments relating to lifetime gifts and Rapport a la Masse are permissible
Ratio Decidendi
Amendments to challenge 2015 and 2017 Wills and plead Rapport a la Masse allowed; amendments seeking account and derivative claims refused as special circumstances not established and executor should pursue such claims; practicality and conflict arguments insufficient to justify derivative action.
Court Disposition
Application to amend allowed in part, refused in part.
Orders
- Amendments relating to 2015 and 2017 Wills permitted.
- Amendments for Rapport a la Masse permitted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment