In the matter of Bailey Ellis Violet and Elliott (Care proceedings) [2019] JRC 006 (21 January 2019)
The Court lacked jurisdiction to order psychological assessments of the children because the threshold criteria under Article 30 of the Children (Jersey) Law 2002 were not met; jurisdiction to order such assessments is contingent upon satisfaction of those criteria and the making of an interim care or supervision order.
- Citation
- [2019] JRC 006
- Parties
- Applicant: Minister; Children: Bailey, Ellis, Violet and Elliott; Respondents: Parents of Bailey, Ellis, Violet and Elliott
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Post Interim Care Order Application, Jurisdictional Ruling
- Outcome
- Order for psychological assessments of children and parents set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Threshold Criteria, Interim Care Orders, Jurisdiction, Psychological Assessment, Inherent Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minister
Applicant
Bailey, Ellis, Violet and Elliott
Children
Parents of Bailey, Ellis, Violet and Elliott
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Post Interim Care Order Application, Jurisdictional Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court had jurisdiction to order assessments of the children when threshold criteria were not met
- 2 Scope of inherent jurisdiction under Children (Jersey) Law 2002
Ratio Decidendi
The Court lacked jurisdiction to order psychological assessments of the children because the threshold criteria under Article 30 of the Children (Jersey) Law 2002 were not met; jurisdiction to order such assessments is contingent upon satisfaction of those criteria and the making of an interim care or supervision order.
Court Disposition
Order for psychological assessments of children and parents set aside.
Orders
- Psychological assessment orders against children and parents set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment