In the matter of Stephen (Supervision order) [2017] JRC 068 (08 May 2017)

In the matter of Stephen (Supervision order) [2017] JRC 068 (08 May 2017)

The supervision order is necessary and in the child's best interests, as it provides a supportive framework for the father and ensures the child's welfare, given the history of harm and the progress made by the father.

Citation
[2017] JRC 068
Parties
Applicant: Minister; Respondent: Mother; Respondent: Father
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
08 May 2017
Procedural Posture
Child Supervision Order Application / Final Judgment With Reasons
Outcome
Supervision order granted for twelve months; care plan approved.
Legal Topics
Supervision Order, Care Plan, Parental Responsibility, Welfare Test
Family Law Child Protection Supervision Order Care Plan Parental Responsibility Welfare Test

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Minister

Applicant

Mother

Respondent

Father

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Child Supervision Order Application / Final Judgment With Reasons

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a supervision order should be granted for the child
  2. 2 Whether the care plan for the child to reside with the father is in the child's best interests

Ratio Decidendi

The supervision order is necessary and in the child's best interests, as it provides a supportive framework for the father and ensures the child's welfare, given the history of harm and the progress made by the father.

Court Disposition

Supervision order granted for twelve months; care plan approved.

Orders

  • Supervision order for twelve months with the Minister as supervisor
  • Care plan approved for the child to reside with the father