In the matter of K (Care Order) [2014] JRC 044 (20 February 2014)
The threshold for a care order was met as K was likely to suffer significant harm if no order was made, and a care order was appropriate to provide necessary support and safeguard K's welfare, with the intention to replace it with a residence order in due course.
- Citation
- [2014] JRC 044
- Parties
- Applicant: Minister; Guardian: Ms Gill Timmis; Kinship Carer: Mr E; Kinship Carer: Mrs E; Respondent: Mother
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Care Order Proceedings / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- final care order granted
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Parental Responsibility, Kinship Care, Contact Arrangements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minister
Applicant
Ms Gill Timmis
Guardian
Mr E
Kinship Carer
Mrs E
Kinship Carer
Mother
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Order Proceedings / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the threshold for a care order under Article 24 of the Children (Jersey) Law 2002 is met
- 2 Whether a residence order would suffice instead of a care order
- 3 Appropriateness of restricting contact between mother and child
Ratio Decidendi
The threshold for a care order was met as K was likely to suffer significant harm if no order was made, and a care order was appropriate to provide necessary support and safeguard K's welfare, with the intention to replace it with a residence order in due course.
Court Disposition
final care order granted
Orders
- Final care order in favour of the Minister
- No contact between mother and K until assessment and formal contact plan by Children's Service
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment