1999/112 - AG v Hamon [1999] UR 112 (18 June 1999)

1999/112 - AG v Hamon [1999] UR 112 (18 June 1999)

There is no realistic alternative to imprisonment for breach of probation, given prior assurances and repeated failures to comply.

Citation
[1999] UR 112
Parties
Defendant: Miss Hamon; Prosecutor: Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
18 June 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
conviction and sentencing
Legal Topics
Breach of Probation, Sentencing, Probation Order
Criminal Law Breach of Probation Sentencing Probation Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miss Hamon

Defendant

Crown

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 breach of probation order
  2. 2 appropriate sentencing for breach

Ratio Decidendi

There is no realistic alternative to imprisonment for breach of probation, given prior assurances and repeated failures to comply.

Court Disposition

conviction and sentencing

Orders

  • 6 months imprisonment on counts 1-14, concurrent
  • 1 month imprisonment on count 1, concurrent