Al-Suleimany v Standard Chartered Grindlays Trust [2005] JRC 058 (27 April 2005)

Al-Suleimany v Standard Chartered Grindlays Trust [2005] JRC 058 (27 April 2005)

There is no clear case of something having gone wrong in the exercise of judicial discretion regarding the costs order; the application for leave to appeal has no realistic prospect of success and is refused.

Citation
[2005] JRC 058
Parties
Applicant: Mohamed; Respondent: Representors; Respondent: Trustee
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
27 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Post Judgment, Application for Leave to Appeal Costs Order
Outcome
application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Costs, Leave to Appeal, Judicial Discretion
Civil Procedure Costs Leave to Appeal Judicial Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamed

Applicant

Representors

Respondent

Trustee

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Post Judgment, Application for Leave to Appeal Costs Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the order for costs made on 8th February 2005
  2. 2 Whether there is a realistic prospect of success on appeal regarding the costs order

Ratio Decidendi

There is no clear case of something having gone wrong in the exercise of judicial discretion regarding the costs order; the application for leave to appeal has no realistic prospect of success and is refused.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal against the costs order is refused.