AG -v- Ackland [2005] JRC 042 (08 April 2005)

AG -v- Ackland [2005] JRC 042 (08 April 2005)

The defendant is punished for failing to comply with building regulations, which resulted in a fatality, despite the personal loss suffered.

Citation
[2005] JRC 042
Parties
Defendant: Mr Ackland; Prosecutor: Crown Advocate
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
08 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and fined
Legal Topics
Building Regulations, Workplace Safety, Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Ackland

Defendant

Crown Advocate

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 failure to comply with building regulations resulting in death
  2. 2 appropriate punishment for breach of safety regulations

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant is punished for failing to comply with building regulations, which resulted in a fatality, despite the personal loss suffered.

Court Disposition

convicted and fined

Orders

  • Fine of £700 on charge 3 or 2 months' imprisonment in default
  • Fine of £300 on charge 4 or 1 month imprisonment in default, consecutive