Baglin -v- AG [2012] JRC 190 (17 October 2012)

Baglin -v- AG [2012] JRC 190 (17 October 2012)

The court found that all three grounds for refusing bail—risk of re-offending, risk of non-attendance, and risk of interference with the course of justice—were made out based on the defendant's criminal history and prior conduct.

Citation
[2012] JRC 190
Parties
Defendant: Mr Baglin; Prosecution: Prosecution
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
17 October 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Application
Outcome
bail refused
Legal Topics
Bail, Risk of Re Offending, Risk of Non Attendance, Risk of Interference With Justice
Criminal Law Bail Risk of Re Offending Risk of Non Attendance Risk of Interference With Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Baglin

Defendant

Prosecution

Prosecution

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Bail Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether bail should be granted to the defendant charged with grave and criminal assault

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that all three grounds for refusing bail—risk of re-offending, risk of non-attendance, and risk of interference with the course of justice—were made out based on the defendant's criminal history and prior conduct.

Court Disposition

bail refused

Orders

  • defendant remanded in custody until 21st January 2013