Watkins v Egglishaw [2001] JRC 248 (17 December 2001)

Watkins v Egglishaw [2001] JRC 248 (17 December 2001)

Mr Connell's resignation, while initially conditional, became unconditional by mutual agreement and subsequent conduct, resulting in his ceasing to be a director and shareholder as of 1 February 1994. The Defendants' counterclaim fails due to lack of evidence, as they did not prove their case at trial and cannot now seek to reopen the issue.

Citation
[2001] JRC 248
Parties
Plaintiff: Mr Connell; Defendants: Defendants (including Mr Richard Egglishaw)
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
17 December 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Judgment on Residual Issues
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim to remain director/shareholder dismissed; Defendants' counterclaim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Director Resignation, Shareholder Rights, Conditional Resignation, Counterclaim Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Connell

Plaintiff

Defendants (including Mr Richard Egglishaw)

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Civil / Post Trial Judgment on Residual Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mr Connell remains a director and shareholder of STR and SMS
  2. 2 Whether the Defendants' counterclaim should succeed

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Connell's resignation, while initially conditional, became unconditional by mutual agreement and subsequent conduct, resulting in his ceasing to be a director and shareholder as of 1 February 1994. The Defendants' counterclaim fails due to lack of evidence, as they did not prove their case at trial and cannot now seek to reopen the issue.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim to remain director/shareholder dismissed; Defendants' counterclaim dismissed.

Orders

  • Mr Connell is not a director or shareholder of STR or SMS as of 1 February 1994.
  • Defendants' counterclaim is dismissed.