Watkins v Egglishaw [2001] JRC 248 (17 December 2001)
Mr Connell's resignation, while initially conditional, became unconditional by mutual agreement and subsequent conduct, resulting in his ceasing to be a director and shareholder as of 1 February 1994. The Defendants' counterclaim fails due to lack of evidence, as they did not prove their case at trial and cannot now seek to reopen the issue.
- Citation
- [2001] JRC 248
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mr Connell; Defendants: Defendants (including Mr Richard Egglishaw)
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial Judgment on Residual Issues
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim to remain director/shareholder dismissed; Defendants' counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Director Resignation, Shareholder Rights, Conditional Resignation, Counterclaim Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Connell
Plaintiff
Defendants (including Mr Richard Egglishaw)
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Judgment on Residual Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Connell remains a director and shareholder of STR and SMS
- 2 Whether the Defendants' counterclaim should succeed
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Connell's resignation, while initially conditional, became unconditional by mutual agreement and subsequent conduct, resulting in his ceasing to be a director and shareholder as of 1 February 1994. The Defendants' counterclaim fails due to lack of evidence, as they did not prove their case at trial and cannot now seek to reopen the issue.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim to remain director/shareholder dismissed; Defendants' counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Mr Connell is not a director or shareholder of STR or SMS as of 1 February 1994.
- Defendants' counterclaim is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment