Devy -v- Taylor 24 Aug-2011 [2011] JRC 165 (24 August 2011)
The caveat was set aside because the respondents failed in their duty to make full and frank disclosure by not drawing the court's attention to documents in their possession that undermined a key allegation in their pleaded case, which was material to the application for ex parte relief.
- Citation
- [2011] JRC 165
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Devy; Respondent: Mr Taylor; Respondent: Miss Taylor
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Lift Caveat / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Caveat lifted (set aside)
- Legal Topics
- Ex Parte Applications, Caveats on Immoveable Property, Full and Frank Disclosure, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy to Defraud
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Devy
Applicant
Mr Taylor
Respondent
Miss Taylor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Lift Caveat / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents failed to make full and frank disclosure when applying ex parte for a caveat on the applicant's property
- 2 Whether the respondents had locus standi to lodge a caveat as alleged creditors
- 3 Whether there was sufficient evidence of risk of dissipation of assets by the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The caveat was set aside because the respondents failed in their duty to make full and frank disclosure by not drawing the court's attention to documents in their possession that undermined a key allegation in their pleaded case, which was material to the application for ex parte relief.
Court Disposition
Caveat lifted (set aside)
Orders
- The caveat on Mr Devy's property is lifted due to failure of full and frank disclosure.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment