AG -v- Garraway and Hamon [2014] JRC 120 (29 May 2014)
Given the serious breach of trust, scale of theft, and aggravating features, custodial sentences are required. Mitigation factors do not amount to exceptional circumstances. Disqualification from acting as a director is appropriate for Garraway due to the seriousness of his conduct.
- Citation
- [2014] JRC 120
- Parties
- Defendant: Mr Garraway; Defendant: Ms Hamon; Victim: Goldford; Victim: Dr Pollard; Victim: Mr Michael Lotherington
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Theft, Fraud, Breach of Trust, Sentencing, Disqualification of Directors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Garraway
Defendant
Ms Hamon
Defendant
Goldford
Victim
Dr Pollard
Victim
Mr Michael Lotherington
Victim
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for theft and fraud by employees in breach of trust
- 2 Application of sentencing principles for breach of trust offences
- 3 Appropriateness of director disqualification under Companies (Jersey) Law 1991
Ratio Decidendi
Given the serious breach of trust, scale of theft, and aggravating features, custodial sentences are required. Mitigation factors do not amount to exceptional circumstances. Disqualification from acting as a director is appropriate for Garraway due to the seriousness of his conduct.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentencing
Orders
- Mr Garraway sentenced to total of 4½ years' imprisonment.
- Mr Garraway disqualified from acting as a director under Article 78(1) of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 for 10 years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment