Graham -v- AG [2013] JRC 014 (22 January 2013)

Graham -v- AG [2013] JRC 014 (22 January 2013)

The conviction for grave and criminal assault was unsafe due to the absence of legal representation for the Appellant, the delay in police investigation, and insufficient evidence to elevate the assault beyond common assault. The evidence was sufficient for a conviction of common assault, but not for grave and criminal assault. The compensation order was inappropriate given the Appellant's means.

Citation
[2013] JRC 014
Parties
Appellant: Mr Graham; Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
22 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence in Magistrate's Court to Royal Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Assault, Hearsay Evidence, Right to Legal Representation, Appeals Procedure, Compensation Orders
Criminal Law Assault Hearsay Evidence Right to Legal Representation Appeals Procedure Compensation Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Graham

Appellant

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence in Magistrate's Court to Royal Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether hearsay evidence was wrongly admitted under the res gestae rule
  2. 2 Whether lack of cross-examination of prosecution witnesses rendered the conviction unsafe
  3. 3 Whether the conviction should be for grave and criminal assault or common assault

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction for grave and criminal assault was unsafe due to the absence of legal representation for the Appellant, the delay in police investigation, and insufficient evidence to elevate the assault beyond common assault. The evidence was sufficient for a conviction of common assault, but not for grave and criminal assault. The compensation order was inappropriate given the Appellant's means.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Conviction for grave and criminal assault set aside and substituted with conviction for common assault
  • Sentence reduced to 90 hours' community service or three months' imprisonment in default