AG -v- Hartley and Others [2011] JRC 017 (21 January 2011)

AG -v- Hartley and Others [2011] JRC 017 (21 January 2011)

The court held that the defendants, having caused loss to others, should compensate the victims for unrecovered losses, and apportioned specific amounts to be paid by each defendant based on their involvement and the losses suffered.

Citation
[2011] JRC 017
Parties
Defendant: Mr Hartley; Defendant: Mr McIntyre; Defendant: Mr Godel; Victims: Mr and Mrs Cameron
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
21 January 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Post Sentencing Compensation Order
Outcome
compensation orders made against defendants
Legal Topics
Compensation Order, Sentencing, Restitution
Criminal Law Compensation Order Sentencing Restitution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Hartley

Defendant

Mr McIntyre

Defendant

Mr Godel

Defendant

Mr and Mrs Cameron

Victims

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Post Sentencing Compensation Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether compensation orders should be made against the defendants for losses caused to victims
  2. 2 Appropriate quantum of compensation for specific losses

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the defendants, having caused loss to others, should compensate the victims for unrecovered losses, and apportioned specific amounts to be paid by each defendant based on their involvement and the losses suffered.

Court Disposition

compensation orders made against defendants

Orders

  • Mr Hartley to pay £389.25 in respect of Counts 5, 12, and 13, and £333.05 in respect of Count 18, totaling £722.30, payable immediately.
  • Mr McIntyre to pay £300 in respect of Counts 5, 12, and 13, payable immediately; if he has paid £800 to the Viscount, £500 to be reimbursed to him.