AG -v- Pietrzyk and Lipski [2011] JRC 200 (07 October 2011)

AG -v- Pietrzyk and Lipski [2011] JRC 200 (07 October 2011)

Custodial sentences are justified due to the seriousness of illegal entry and larceny, with aggravating distress to victims; deportation is recommended as continued presence is detrimental and not disproportionate under ECHR.

Citation
[2011] JRC 200
Parties
Defendant: Mr Lipski; Defendant: Mr Pietrzyk; Prosecution: Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
07 October 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Burglary, Larceny, Deportation, Sentencing
Criminal Law Burglary Larceny Deportation Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Lipski

Defendant

Mr Pietrzyk

Defendant

Crown

Prosecution

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 illegal entry into domestic premises
  2. 2 larceny of goods
  3. 3 deportation recommendation

Ratio Decidendi

Custodial sentences are justified due to the seriousness of illegal entry and larceny, with aggravating distress to victims; deportation is recommended as continued presence is detrimental and not disproportionate under ECHR.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Mr Lipski sentenced to 3 years' imprisonment, counts to run concurrently.
  • Mr Pietrzyk sentenced to 2.5 years' imprisonment, counts to run concurrently.