Baker -v- Auger [2012] JRC 080A (19 April 2012)
Leave to appeal is refused because there is no indication of any misdirection in law or unreasonable assessment of evidence by the lower court, and the applicant failed to appear to provide further justification.
- Citation
- [2012] JRC 080A
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Mark Baker; Respondent: Mr Wayne Auger
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Petty Debts Court Judgment
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal rejected
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Late Application, Appellate Review, Assessment of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Mark Baker
Applicant
Mr Wayne Auger
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Petty Debts Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted despite late application
- 2 Whether lower court erred in law or made an unreasonable decision on the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal is refused because there is no indication of any misdirection in law or unreasonable assessment of evidence by the lower court, and the applicant failed to appear to provide further justification.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment