Mccarrick v AG [2001] JRC 205 (15 October 2001)

Mccarrick v AG [2001] JRC 205 (15 October 2001)

The appeal was allowed because the Magistrate failed to ensure the unrepresented appellant understood his right to legal assistance, constituting an exceptional circumstance justifying interference with the conviction.

Citation
[2001] JRC 205
Parties
Appellant: Mr. McCarrick; Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
15 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From Magistrate's Court
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Dangerous Driving, Right to Legal Representation, Appeal Procedure, Fresh Evidence, Fair Trial
Criminal Law Road Traffic Law Dangerous Driving Right to Legal Representation Appeal Procedure Fresh Evidence Fair Trial

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr. McCarrick

Appellant

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From Magistrate's Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's guilty plea was valid given lack of legal representation and understanding of the charge
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
  3. 3 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was allowed because the Magistrate failed to ensure the unrepresented appellant understood his right to legal assistance, constituting an exceptional circumstance justifying interference with the conviction.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Conviction quashed
  • Case remanded to Magistrate's Court for rehearing de novo before another Magistrate