AG -v- Oeillet and Hampton [2014] JRC 142C (14 July 2014)

AG -v- Oeillet and Hampton [2014] JRC 142C (14 July 2014)

The seriousness of burglary, affray, and drug possession, combined with prior record and public fear, justifies consecutive sentences totaling 5 years 6 months for Mr Oeillet and 19 months for Mr Hampton; mitigation factors do not warrant reduction.

Citation
[2014] JRC 142C
Parties
Defendant: Mr Oeillet; Victim: HSBC; Defendant: Mr Hampton
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
14 July 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Outcome
conviction and custodial sentence
Legal Topics
False Pretences, Burglary, Larceny, Affray, Drug Possession, Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Oeillet

Defendant

HSBC

Victim

Mr Hampton

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing Judgment

  1. 1 obtaining goods by false pretences
  2. 2 burglary and larceny
  3. 3 affray

Ratio Decidendi

The seriousness of burglary, affray, and drug possession, combined with prior record and public fear, justifies consecutive sentences totaling 5 years 6 months for Mr Oeillet and 19 months for Mr Hampton; mitigation factors do not warrant reduction.

Court Disposition

conviction and custodial sentence

Orders

  • Mr Oeillet sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment on counts 1-6 (concurrent), 2 years 6 months on count 7 (consecutive), and 18 months on count 1 of Second Indictment (consecutive), totaling 5 years 6 months' imprisonment.
  • Mr Hampton sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment for affray and 1 month consecutive for drug possession, totaling 19 months' imprisonment.