AG -v- Oeillet and Hampton [2014] JRC 142C (14 July 2014)
The seriousness of burglary, affray, and drug possession, combined with prior record and public fear, justifies consecutive sentences totaling 5 years 6 months for Mr Oeillet and 19 months for Mr Hampton; mitigation factors do not warrant reduction.
- Citation
- [2014] JRC 142C
- Parties
- Defendant: Mr Oeillet; Victim: HSBC; Defendant: Mr Hampton
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and custodial sentence
- Legal Topics
- False Pretences, Burglary, Larceny, Affray, Drug Possession, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Oeillet
Defendant
HSBC
Victim
Mr Hampton
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 obtaining goods by false pretences
- 2 burglary and larceny
- 3 affray
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of burglary, affray, and drug possession, combined with prior record and public fear, justifies consecutive sentences totaling 5 years 6 months for Mr Oeillet and 19 months for Mr Hampton; mitigation factors do not warrant reduction.
Court Disposition
conviction and custodial sentence
Orders
- Mr Oeillet sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment on counts 1-6 (concurrent), 2 years 6 months on count 7 (consecutive), and 18 months on count 1 of Second Indictment (consecutive), totaling 5 years 6 months' imprisonment.
- Mr Hampton sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment for affray and 1 month consecutive for drug possession, totaling 19 months' imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment