1999/26 - AG v Richardson [1999] UR 26 (5 February 1999)

1999/26 - AG v Richardson [1999] UR 26 (5 February 1999)

The defendant's cooperation, repayment of arrears, and admission of guilt mitigate the seriousness of the offence, justifying a reduced sentence.

Citation
[1999] UR 26
Parties
Defendant: Mr Richardson; Prosecutor: Crown Advocate
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
05 February 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and fined
Legal Topics
Failure to Pay Social Security Contributions, Fraud, Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Richardson

Defendant

Crown Advocate

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether failure to pay social security contributions constitutes a criminal offence
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence for admitted infractions

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's cooperation, repayment of arrears, and admission of guilt mitigate the seriousness of the offence, justifying a reduced sentence.

Court Disposition

convicted and fined

Orders

  • Fine of £150 on each odd numbered count or 1 week imprisonment in default, consecutive
  • Fine of £300 on each even numbered count or 2 weeks imprisonment in default, consecutive