1999/26 - AG v Richardson [1999] UR 26 (5 February 1999)
The defendant's cooperation, repayment of arrears, and admission of guilt mitigate the seriousness of the offence, justifying a reduced sentence.
- Citation
- [1999] UR 26
- Parties
- Defendant: Mr Richardson; Prosecutor: Crown Advocate
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and fined
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Pay Social Security Contributions, Fraud, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
Mr Richardson
Defendant
Crown Advocate
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to pay social security contributions constitutes a criminal offence
- 2 Appropriate sentence for admitted infractions
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's cooperation, repayment of arrears, and admission of guilt mitigate the seriousness of the offence, justifying a reduced sentence.
Court Disposition
convicted and fined
Orders
- Fine of £150 on each odd numbered count or 1 week imprisonment in default, consecutive
- Fine of £300 on each even numbered count or 2 weeks imprisonment in default, consecutive
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment