AB CD EF and GH -v- Syvret [2013] JRC 171 (04 September 2013)

The hearing and judgment were held in private and redacted to protect the representors' identities and sensitive information, as publicity would defeat the object of the proceedings. Costs are awarded against the respondent on a standard basis due to his persistent breaches and obstruction. No further action is taken regarding contempt due to futility.

Citation: [2013] JRC 171
Parties: Representors: AB, CD, EF, GH; Respondent: Mr Syvret
Jurisdiction: Jersey
Judgment Date: 04 September 2013
Procedural Posture: Injunction and Costs Application / Post Judgment, Ancillary Matters
Outcome: Judgment redacted and published in limited form; costs awarded to representors on standard basis; no further action on contempt.
Legal Topics: Reporting Restrictions, Costs, Contempt of Court, Injunction Breaches

Data Protection Civil Procedure Reporting Restrictions Costs Contempt of Court Injunction Breaches

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2

Parties

AB, CD, EF, GH

Representors

Mr Syvret

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Injunction and Costs Application / Post Judgment, Ancillary Matters

Legal Issues

1 extent of permissible reporting of judgment
2 costs order for hearing
3 action regarding breaches of injunction

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Judgment redacted and published in limited form; costs awarded to representors on standard basis; no further action on contempt.

Orders

Names of representors to be redacted from judgment.
Certain biographical and sensitive passages to be redacted as specified.