Tech Holdings BV and Jeimon Holdings [2008] JCA 085 (21 May 2008)

Tech Holdings BV and Jeimon Holdings [2008] JCA 085 (21 May 2008)

The stay is continued as there is no prejudice to the respondents, and a procedural timetable is set for responses and revisions to the Notice of Appeal.

Citation
[2008] JCA 085
Parties
Appellant: Mr Thompson; Respondent: Miss Gilbert
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
21 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory
Outcome
stay continued; procedural timetable set
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Appeal Procedure, Case Management
Civil Procedure Stay of Proceedings Appeal Procedure Case Management

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Thompson

Appellant

Miss Gilbert

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Interlocutory

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to continue the stay of the order dated 6th May, 2008
  2. 2 Determination of procedural timetable for the appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The stay is continued as there is no prejudice to the respondents, and a procedural timetable is set for responses and revisions to the Notice of Appeal.

Court Disposition

stay continued; procedural timetable set

Orders

  • Stay continued to the last day of the July Sitting of the Court of Appeal of Jersey.
  • Respondents to present a response within 21 days or sooner if possible.