AG -v- Whelan Grace and Robinson [2017] JRC 040B (14 March 2017)
Custodial sentences are mandatory for substantial money laundering offences regardless of mitigation, with sentence length determined by involvement, previous convictions, and cooperation.
- Citation
- [2017] JRC 040B
- Parties
- Defendant: Mr Whelan; Defendant: Mr Grace; Defendant: Mr Robinson; Prosecutor: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and custodial sentences imposed
- Legal Topics
- Money Laundering, Proceeds of Crime, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Parties
Mr Whelan
Defendant
Mr Grace
Defendant
Mr Robinson
Defendant
The Crown
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 appropriate sentencing for money laundering involving substantial sums
- 2 consideration of mitigation and previous convictions
- 3 application of sentencing policy changes
Ratio Decidendi
Custodial sentences are mandatory for substantial money laundering offences regardless of mitigation, with sentence length determined by involvement, previous convictions, and cooperation.
Court Disposition
conviction and custodial sentences imposed
Orders
- Mr Whelan sentenced to 27 months' imprisonment for Count 1 and 15 months for Count 2, total 42 months (3½ years) imprisonment.
- Mr Grace sentenced to 2 years' imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment