AG -v- N [2018] JRC 011 (16 January 2018)

AG -v- N [2018] JRC 011 (16 January 2018)

The applicant demonstrated exceptional circumstances due to his age at offending, autism diagnosis, compliance with notification requirements, low risk of reoffending, and vulnerability to stress from publicity. The Court was satisfied that the risk of sexual harm did not justify continued notification requirements and ordered removal.

Citation
[2018] JRC 011
Parties
Applicant: N; Respondent: Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
16 January 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Removal From Sex Offender Notification Requirements / Post Sentencing, Application Hearing
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Sex Offender Notification Requirements, Removal From Register, Open Justice, Autism and Criminal Responsibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

N

Applicant

Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Removal From Sex Offender Notification Requirements / Post Sentencing, Application Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be removed from the sex offender notification requirements under the Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010
  2. 2 Whether the hearing should be held in private and the judgment anonymised

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated exceptional circumstances due to his age at offending, autism diagnosis, compliance with notification requirements, low risk of reoffending, and vulnerability to stress from publicity. The Court was satisfied that the risk of sexual harm did not justify continued notification requirements and ordered removal.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • hearing held in camera
  • judgment anonymised