1999/152 - AG v Nafkha [1999] UR 152 (13 September 1999)
Bail refused due to seriousness of the offence and sufficient evidence supporting refusal, including victim's injuries and multiple witnesses.
- Citation
- [1999] UR 152
- Parties
- Applicant: Nafkha; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Review
- Outcome
- bail refused
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Sentencing, Assault
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
Nafkha
Applicant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Magistrate erred in refusing bail to Nafkha
- 2 Whether the seriousness of the offence justifies refusal of bail
Ratio Decidendi
Bail refused due to seriousness of the offence and sufficient evidence supporting refusal, including victim's injuries and multiple witnesses.
Court Disposition
bail refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment