Nautech Servs. v CSS Ltd. [2013] 1 JLR 462 (13 May 2013)

Nautech Servs. v CSS Ltd. [2013] 1 JLR 462 (13 May 2013)

Plaintiff seeking an Anton Piller order ex parte must make full and frank disclosure, seek the least intrusive order necessary, and ensure all relevant material and authorities are presented to the court.

Citation
[2013] 1 JLR 462
Parties
Plaintiff: Nautech Servs.; Defendant: CSS Ltd.
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
13 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Injunction (anton Piller Order) / Ex Parte Application; Application to Discharge or Vary Order
Outcome
Guidance on procedural requirements for Anton Piller orders; no final disposition on merits reported.
Legal Topics
Anton Piller Orders, Injunctions, Ex Parte Applications, Disclosure Obligations
Civil Procedure Anton Piller Orders Injunctions Ex Parte Applications Disclosure Obligations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nautech Servs.

Plaintiff

CSS Ltd.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Injunction (anton Piller Order) / Ex Parte Application; Application to Discharge or Vary Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What are the duties of a plaintiff seeking an Anton Piller order on an ex parte basis?
  2. 2 What procedural safeguards must be observed in such applications?

Ratio Decidendi

Plaintiff seeking an Anton Piller order ex parte must make full and frank disclosure, seek the least intrusive order necessary, and ensure all relevant material and authorities are presented to the court.

Court Disposition

Guidance on procedural requirements for Anton Piller orders; no final disposition on merits reported.

Orders

  • Application to discharge or vary order to be dealt with promptly; parties to be available at short notice.