Jersey Judgment

Neild v AG [1994] JCA 194 (28 September 1994)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found no reason to interfere with the conviction as it was neither unsafe nor unsatisfactory.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • conviction upheld

02

Material facts

Parties

Neild

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the conviction should be upheld

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant contended that the conviction was unsafe and should be overturned.
Respondent
The respondent argued that the conviction was proper and should be upheld.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Common law

    The appellate court will not interfere with a conviction unless it is unsafe or unsatisfactory.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found no reason to interfere with the conviction as it was neither unsafe nor unsatisfactory.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • conviction upheld

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1994] JCA 194

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Unreported Judgments You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Unreported Judgments >> Neild v AG [1994] JCA 194 (28 September 1994) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1994/1994_194.html Cite as: [1994] JCA 194 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Neild v AG [1994] JCA 194 (28 September 1994) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [1994] JCA 194 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1994/1994_194.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.