Neild v AG [1994] JCA 194 (28 September 1994)

The court found no reason to interfere with the conviction as it was neither unsafe nor unsatisfactory.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [1994] JCA 194
Parties: Applicant: Neild; Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction: Jersey
Judgment Date: 28 September 1994
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Judgment
Outcome: appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Appeal Against Conviction

Criminal Law Appeal Against Conviction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Neild

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the conviction should be upheld

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no reason to interfere with the conviction as it was neither unsafe nor unsatisfactory.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

conviction upheld

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.