Neville v. Att. Gen. [2017] 1 JLR_Note 4 (16 March 2017)
The court held that litigants in person may be entitled to costs, but the award is subject to the court's discretion and assessment of reasonableness.
- Parties
- Applicant: Neville; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Determination
- Outcome
- costs awarded to litigant in person, subject to assessment
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Litigants in Person
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Neville
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a litigant in person is entitled to costs
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that litigants in person may be entitled to costs, but the award is subject to the court's discretion and assessment of reasonableness.
Court Disposition
costs awarded to litigant in person, subject to assessment
Orders
- Applicant awarded costs as a litigant in person, quantum to be assessed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment