AG v Nicolle [2004] JRC 057 (26 March 2004)

AG v Nicolle [2004] JRC 057 (26 March 2004)

Nicolle was found to be a participant in the attempted break and entry, not an innocent bystander. Despite his poor record, mitigating factors including positive probation report, family background, and time since last offence justified a probation order rather than immediate imprisonment.

Citation
[2004] JRC 057
Parties
Defendant: Nicolle; Prosecutor: Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
26 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Outcome
Defendant placed on two years' probation.
Legal Topics
Attempted Breaking and Entering, Possession of Dangerous Weapon, Possession of Cannabis, Probation, Sentencing
Criminal Law Attempted Breaking and Entering Possession of Dangerous Weapon Possession of Cannabis Probation Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nicolle

Defendant

Crown

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Nicolle was an innocent bystander or participant in attempted break and entry
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence for attempted breaking and entering
  3. 3 Consideration of prior criminal record and mitigating circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

Nicolle was found to be a participant in the attempted break and entry, not an innocent bystander. Despite his poor record, mitigating factors including positive probation report, family background, and time since last offence justified a probation order rather than immediate imprisonment.

Court Disposition

Defendant placed on two years' probation.

Orders

  • Attend Offending Is Not The Only Choice Programme.
  • Liaise with Alcohol and Drug Service and attend regular sessions.