AG v Noon [2001] JRC 172 (02 August 2001)
The court declined to adopt the proposed sentencing table for ecstasy due to insufficient evidence and legal authority, and instead relied on previous cases to determine starting points for sentencing. Noon was sentenced as the prime mover with a starting point of eleven years, reduced to seven for a guilty plea. Mrs. Noon, manipulated and of previous good character, received a starting point of nine years, reduced to five for mitigation.
- Citation
- [2001] JRC 172
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Defendant: Noon; Defendant: Mrs. Noon
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction and sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Drug Trafficking, Sentencing Guidelines, Class a Drugs, Importation of Ecstasy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Noon
Defendant
Mrs. Noon
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to adopt a table of starting points for sentencing in ecstasy trafficking cases
- 2 Appropriate sentence for importation of ecstasy tablets by the accused
Ratio Decidendi
The court declined to adopt the proposed sentencing table for ecstasy due to insufficient evidence and legal authority, and instead relied on previous cases to determine starting points for sentencing. Noon was sentenced as the prime mover with a starting point of eleven years, reduced to seven for a guilty plea. Mrs. Noon, manipulated and of previous good character, received a starting point of nine years, reduced to five for mitigation.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentencing
Orders
- Noon sentenced to seven years' imprisonment
- Mrs. Noon sentenced to five years' imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment