Not reproduced v [1970] JJ 1563 (01 October 1970)
Auction prices do not carry greater weight than private treaty prices; Committee may control prices and indicate maximum consent price to prevent undue increases.
- Citation
- [1970] JJ 1563
- Parties
- Applicant: Not reproduced; Respondent: Committee
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 1970
- Procedural Posture
- Housing Consent Application / Decision on Application
- Outcome
- application rejected
- Legal Topics
- Housing Consent, Price Control, Auction Pricing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Not reproduced
Applicant
Committee
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Housing Consent Application / Decision on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether auction price should carry greater weight than private treaty price in housing consent applications
- 2 Whether competitive forces at auction justify price control by Committee
- 3 Legitimacy of Committee indicating maximum price for consent
Ratio Decidendi
Auction prices do not carry greater weight than private treaty prices; Committee may control prices and indicate maximum consent price to prevent undue increases.
Court Disposition
application rejected
Orders
- Committee may indicate highest price to which it would consent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment