Orange Capital v Standard Bank [2014] 1 JLR_Note 3 (14 November 2013)
The court considered whether a corporate plaintiff should be required to provide security for costs.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Orange Capital; Defendant: Standard Bank
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Security for Costs, Corporate Plaintiff
Civil Procedure Costs Security for Costs Corporate Plaintiff
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Orange Capital
Plaintiff
Standard Bank
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a corporate plaintiff should provide security for costs
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered whether a corporate plaintiff should be required to provide security for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment