O'Shea v AG [1993] JRC 079 (23 June 1993)

O'Shea v AG [1993] JRC 079 (23 June 1993)

The court held that the Attorney General's discretion to prosecute is not lightly interfered with unless exercised in bad faith or contrary to law.

Citation
[1993] JRC 079
Parties
Applicant: O'Shea; Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
23 June 1993
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Prosecution, Public Interest

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

O'Shea

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution should proceed against O'Shea
  2. 2 Whether the Attorney General acted within discretion

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Attorney General's discretion to prosecute is not lightly interfered with unless exercised in bad faith or contrary to law.

Court Disposition

application dismissed